Archive:000/Heat pump
An electric heat pump is one way to heat a building. It works a lot like air conditioning but in reverse: The hot air goes indoors; the cold air goes outdoors.
Energy efficiency
Heat pumps can be more energy-efficient than electric heaters. But this efficiency gain disappears when the outdoor temperature is cold enough.[QUANTIFICATION needed]
Worse: When electricity is generated by fossil fuels, electric heating has up to 3 times the carbon emissions of just burning the fossil fuels directly in a natural gas furnace [see why]. Heat pumps are almost never efficient enough to make up for this.
Maybe it's worth getting a heat pump if you live in an area where winters are moderate and electricity is generated mostly by renewables or nuclear.[WORLD MAP needed]
Can be a case study or generalized statistics
- Need graph: Heat pump efficiency vs outdoor temperature.
- Life cycle analysis
- How much energy does it typically take to manufacture and install a heat pump?
- How often (if ever) is it viable/worthwhile to repurpose an air conditioner in the winter, to help with heating?
- Are there any "reversible" heat pumps that can work for both heating and cooling? (why)
Refrigerant chemicals
Because of how heat pumps work, they must contain a substance known as a refrigerant. Most refrigerants in use today[ELABORATION needed] happen to be potent greenhouse gases. They aren't supposed to leak out into the atmosphere - but they sometimes do, if the heat pump gets old or is disposed of improperly.
This section is incomplete. It needs:
- Quantification
- How much of climate change is due to refrigerants?
- How much worse would it be if we all used heat pumps to heat our homes?
- How does this compare to the status quo of heating (often natural gas)?
- Solutions
- Are there any alternatives - refrigerants that aren't greenhouse gases? And are there tradeoffs? [new page needed]
See also