Archive:000/Term:viable - Revision history

Elie: Elie moved page Term:viable to Archive:000/Term:viable without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor

2024-10-26T20:30:13Z

Elie moved page Term:viable to Archive:000/Term:viable without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:30, 26 October 2024
(No difference)

Elie at 13:30, 19 March 2024

2024-03-19T13:30:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 19 March 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:


	If this sounds hard, well yes it is, unfortunately. It would be a lot easier if academic papers weren't so hard-to-read and hidden behind paywalls. Hopefully this wiki can make complex ideas more accessible. If you're a writer, see [[Project:Notation]] for how to cover advanced topics without ugly walls of text.		If this sounds hard, well yes it is, unfortunately. It would be a lot easier if academic papers weren't so hard-to-read and hidden behind paywalls. Hopefully this wiki can make complex ideas more accessible. If you're a writer, see [[Project:Notation\|Notation]] for how to cover advanced topics without ugly walls of text.


	We welcome ideas that are physically viable, even when they aren't politically{{x\|meaning: we don't give a crap about preserving the status quo if there are better ways the world could work. However, this wiki is ''not'' a place for unethical, harmful, or fascist{{x\|definition will be added soon}}ideas. To keep it simple: Don't be an asshole.}}viable.  Radical change becomes easier the more people see that an idea could work.		We welcome ideas that are physically viable, even when they aren't politically{{x\|meaning: we don't give a crap about preserving the status quo if there are better ways the world could work. However, this wiki is ''not'' a place for unethical, harmful, or fascist{{x\|definition will be added soon}}ideas. To keep it simple: Don't be an asshole.}}viable.  Radical change becomes easier the more people see that an idea could work.

Elie at 13:29, 19 March 2024

2024-03-19T13:29:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 19 March 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:


	If this sounds hard, well yes it is, unfortunately. It would be a lot easier if academic papers weren't so hard-to-read and hidden behind paywalls. Hopefully this wiki can make complex ideas more accessible. If you're a writer, see [[~~Wiki for a better world~~:Notation]] for how to cover advanced topics without ugly walls of text.		If this sounds hard, well yes it is, unfortunately. It would be a lot easier if academic papers weren't so hard-to-read and hidden behind paywalls. Hopefully this wiki can make complex ideas more accessible. If you're a writer, see [[Project:Notation]] for how to cover advanced topics without ugly walls of text.


	We welcome ideas that are physically viable, even when they aren't politically{{x\|meaning: we don't give a crap about preserving the status quo if there are better ways the world could work. However, this wiki is ''not'' a place for unethical, harmful, or fascist{{x\|definition will be added soon}}ideas. To keep it simple: Don't be an asshole.}}viable.  Radical change becomes easier the more people see that an idea could work.		We welcome ideas that are physically viable, even when they aren't politically{{x\|meaning: we don't give a crap about preserving the status quo if there are better ways the world could work. However, this wiki is ''not'' a place for unethical, harmful, or fascist{{x\|definition will be added soon}}ideas. To keep it simple: Don't be an asshole.}}viable.  Radical change becomes easier the more people see that an idea could work.

Elie at 22:04, 5 April 2023

2023-04-05T22:04:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 5 April 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:

	If this sounds hard, well yes it is, unfortunately. It would be a lot easier if academic papers weren't so hard-to-read and hidden behind paywalls. Hopefully this wiki can make complex ideas more accessible. If you're a writer, see [[Wiki for a better world:Notation]] for how to cover advanced topics without ugly walls of text.		If this sounds hard, well yes it is, unfortunately. It would be a lot easier if academic papers weren't so hard-to-read and hidden behind paywalls. Hopefully this wiki can make complex ideas more accessible. If you're a writer, see [[Wiki for a better world:Notation]] for how to cover advanced topics without ugly walls of text.


			We welcome ideas that are physically viable, even when they aren't politically{{x\|meaning: we don't give a crap about preserving the status quo if there are better ways the world could work. However, this wiki is ''not'' a place for unethical, harmful, or fascist{{x\|definition will be added soon}}ideas. To keep it simple: Don't be an asshole.}}viable.  Radical change becomes easier the more people see that an idea could work.

Elie at 20:40, 14 March 2023

2023-03-14T20:40:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, 14 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	On this wiki, we have high standards for the word "viable". When it comes to sustainability, it's not enough for an idea to just work in some niche market. It has to be ''scaleable'' enough to that it could actually replace existing systems that are harming the planet. We need to make sure that the idea wouldn't in fact ~~become~~ ''worse'' for the planet ~~if scaled up~~.		On this wiki, we have high standards for the word "viable". When it comes to sustainability, it's not enough for an idea to just work in some niche market. It has to be ''scaleable'' enough to that it could actually replace existing systems that are harming the planet. We need to make sure that the idea (if scaled up) wouldn't in fact be ''worse'' for the planet (compared to the status quo).

	Here are some factors to consider:		Here are some factors to consider:
	* How much [[energy]] would it consume?		* How much [[energy]] would it consume?
	* How many rare [[minerals]] would it need?		* How many rare [[minerals]] would it need?
			* How much [[land]] would it occupy?
	* How much [[labor]] would it take?		* How much [[labor]] would it take?
	All of these should be considered in a full [[life cycle analysis]], from ''production'' to ''usage'' to ''recycling/disposal''.		All of these should be considered in a full [[life cycle analysis]] - from ''production'', to ''usage'', to ''recycling/disposal''.


			If this sounds hard, well yes it is, unfortunately. It would be a lot easier if academic papers weren't so hard-to-read and hidden behind paywalls. Hopefully this wiki can make complex ideas more accessible. If you're a writer, see [[Wiki for a better world:Notation]] for how to cover advanced topics without ugly walls of text.

Elie: Created page with "On this wiki, we have high standards for the word "viable". When it comes to sustainability, it's not enough for an idea to just work in some niche market. It has to be ''scaleable'' enough to that it could actually replace existing systems that are harming the planet. We need to make sure that the idea wouldn't in fact become ''worse'' for the planet if scaled up. Here are some factors to consider: * How much energy would it consume? * How many rare minerals wo..."

2023-03-14T08:36:21Z

Created page with "On this wiki, we have high standards for the word "viable". When it comes to sustainability, it's not enough for an idea to just work in some niche market. It has to be ''scaleable'' enough to that it could actually replace existing systems that are harming the planet. We need to make sure that the idea wouldn't in fact become ''worse'' for the planet if scaled up. Here are some factors to consider: * How much energy would it consume? * How many rare minerals wo..."

New page

On this wiki, we have high standards for the word "viable". When it comes to sustainability, it's not enough for an idea to just work in some niche market. It has to be ''scaleable'' enough to that it could actually replace existing systems that are harming the planet. We need to make sure that the idea wouldn't in fact become ''worse'' for the planet if scaled up.

Here are some factors to consider:
* How much [[energy]] would it consume?
* How many rare [[minerals]] would it need?
* How much [[labor]] would it take?
All of these should be considered in a full [[life cycle analysis]], from ''production'' to ''usage'' to ''recycling/disposal''.