Archive talk:000/Minimal consumption scenario - Revision history

Elie: Elie moved page Talk:Minimal consumption scenario to Archive talk:000/Minimal consumption scenario without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor

2024-10-26T20:30:20Z

Elie moved page Talk:Minimal consumption scenario to Archive talk:000/Minimal consumption scenario without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:30, 26 October 2024
(No difference)

Elie at 04:42, 29 May 2022

2022-05-29T04:42:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 29 May 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:

	[[User:Elie\|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie\|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)		[[User:Elie\|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie\|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

			==Bar graph approach==
			Maybe use [[File:energy-demand-status-quo.png]] with labels of "this section can be dealt with by..."? Or use that idea on other pages - for example [[walkability]] would say "this page deals with 'road vehicles - passenger'. See other pages to deal with other sections of this bar graph" idk<br />[[User:Elie\|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie\|talk]]) 00:42, 29 May 2022 (EDT)

Elie: /* Emphasis on globalness */

2022-05-25T02:59:21Z

Emphasis on globalness

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 24 May 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Emphasis on globalness==		==Emphasis on globalness==
	This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption?", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably?".		This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably".

	So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extreme inequality).		So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status-quo (extreme inequality).

	Is it easy for people to see that that's the ~~intent~~? Or should the ~~'analysis needed'~~ section be rephrased?		Is it easy for people to see that that's the intended analysis? Or should the bottom section be rephrased?

	[[User:Elie\|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie\|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)		[[User:Elie\|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie\|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

Elie: /* Emphasis on globalness */

2022-05-25T02:55:13Z

Emphasis on globalness

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 24 May 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Emphasis on globalness==		==Emphasis on globalness==
	This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop ~~more~~ sustainably".		This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption?", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably?".

	So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extreme inequality).		So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extreme inequality).

Elie: Created page with "==Is the intro too long?== Do we really need the first part before 'the scenario'? I get a feeling it might be better on a different page. ~~~~ ==Emphasis on globalness== This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop more sustainably". So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extrem..."

2022-05-25T02:54:38Z

Created page with "==Is the intro too long?== Do we really need the first part before 'the scenario'? I get a feeling it might be better on a different page. ~~~~ ==Emphasis on globalness== This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop more sustainably". So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extrem..."

New page

==Is the intro too long?==
Do we really need the first part before 'the scenario'? I get a feeling it might be better on a different page. [[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

==Emphasis on globalness==
This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop more sustainably".

So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extreme inequality).

Is it easy for people to see that that's the intent? Or should the 'analysis needed' section be rephrased?

[[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)