<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://thechange.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Don%27t_demolish_existing_buildings</id>
	<title>Don't demolish existing buildings - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://thechange.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Don%27t_demolish_existing_buildings"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://thechange.wiki/index.php?title=Don%27t_demolish_existing_buildings&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T05:54:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://thechange.wiki/index.php?title=Don%27t_demolish_existing_buildings&amp;diff=2707&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Elie: Created page with &quot;==Status quo, and why it's a problem== {{empty}} {{talk|Older homes &amp; buildings are demolished to make room for new ones {{pbr}}~ In some cases, it barely increases the housing supply at all {{pbr}}~ And when it does, it does so very inefficiently. For the same amount of materials &amp; labor, they could have kept the old ''and'' built the new {{pbr}}~ Huge environmental footprint - even when you factor in the land use {{pbr}}~ Drives up the price of materials {{pbr}}~ Drive...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://thechange.wiki/index.php?title=Don%27t_demolish_existing_buildings&amp;diff=2707&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-12-16T00:46:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;==Status quo, and why it&amp;#039;s a problem== {{empty}} {{talk|Older homes &amp;amp; buildings are demolished to make room for new ones {{pbr}}~ In some cases, it barely increases the housing supply at all {{pbr}}~ And when it does, it does so very inefficiently. For the same amount of materials &amp;amp; labor, they could have kept the old &amp;#039;&amp;#039;and&amp;#039;&amp;#039; built the new {{pbr}}~ Huge environmental footprint - even when you factor in the land use {{pbr}}~ Drives up the price of materials {{pbr}}~ Drive...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Status quo, and why it's a problem==&lt;br /&gt;
{{empty}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{talk|Older homes &amp;amp; buildings are demolished to make room for new ones&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ In some cases, it barely increases the housing supply at all&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ And when it does, it does so very inefficiently. For the same amount of materials &amp;amp; labor, they could have kept the old ''and'' built the new&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ Huge environmental footprint - even when you factor in the land use&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ Drives up the price of materials&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ Drives up the price of construction labor (especially as there's such a [[shortage of trades workers]])&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ Drives up the price of housing for everyone&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ Benefits only the rich (gentrification)&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ Why it happens: Shortage of good locations, so prime real estate goes to the highest bidder. The land is valued so high that whoever buys it wants to get their money's worth - so they spend a lot of resources renovating to satisfy their tastes&lt;br /&gt;
{{pbr}}~ So in a certain sense, rich people's preferences override poor people's needs}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Better solutions==&lt;br /&gt;
{{empty}} {{talk|be sure to make clear that ''condemned'' buildings should still be demolished of course, if they're structurally unsound or whatnot}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lower the cost of housing]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Elie</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>