<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://thechange.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=the_change_wiki%3APurpose</id>
	<title>the change wiki:Purpose - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://thechange.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=the_change_wiki%3APurpose"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://thechange.wiki/index.php?title=the_change_wiki:Purpose&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-27T05:10:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://thechange.wiki/index.php?title=the_change_wiki:Purpose&amp;diff=1418&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Elie: Created page with &quot;The general idea is to ask &quot;What '''could''' be done to make the world better '''if''' we had the political will?&quot; -- and to really develop a proper nuanced answer that addresses the valid concerns of naysayers.   I believe that this is a crucial &quot;first step&quot; that's been missing from the political landscape. When people skip it and go straight to campaigning for change, the change usually fails because:  # An &quot;opposition&quot; forms from people who misunderstand the change. T...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://thechange.wiki/index.php?title=the_change_wiki:Purpose&amp;diff=1418&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-07-24T22:37:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;The general idea is to ask &amp;quot;What &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;could&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; be done to make the world better &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;if&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; we had the political will?&amp;quot; -- and to really develop a proper nuanced answer that addresses the valid concerns of naysayers.   I believe that this is a crucial &amp;quot;first step&amp;quot; that&amp;#039;s been missing from the political landscape. When people skip it and go straight to campaigning for change, the change usually fails because:  # An &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot; forms from people who misunderstand the change. T...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The general idea is to ask &amp;quot;What '''could''' be done to make the world better '''if''' we had the political will?&amp;quot; -- and to really develop a proper nuanced answer that addresses the valid concerns of naysayers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe that this is a crucial &amp;quot;first step&amp;quot; that's been missing from the political landscape. When people skip it and go straight to campaigning for change, the change usually fails because:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# An &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot; forms from people who misunderstand the change. The whole thing gets painted as &amp;quot;controversial&amp;quot;, and even objective facts are suddenly considered opinions. The best ideas don't get heard through the noise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: {{minor|&amp;amp;nbsp;The next problem happens even in cases ''without'' opposition:{{linespacer}} }}&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;li value=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;When we don't fill in the important details ourselves, this gives way too much power to governments &amp;amp; corporations to fill in those details any way they see fit.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#* Corrupt legislators can easily create massive loopholes and pretend they're listening to the people.&lt;br /&gt;
#* Corporations can easily outsource their environmental footprint while pretending to reduce it.&lt;br /&gt;
#* Even in a full enlightened revolution, the new regime could impose the opposite of what we fought for.&lt;br /&gt;
I built this platform as a way to help overcome these problems. By painting a clear picture of the change we need, hopefully we can build the solidarity that it takes to make it happen.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Elie</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>