Archive:000/Organic solar cells: Difference between revisions

From the change wiki
(Created page with "{{considerations}} ==Considerations== ===Lifespan=== {{basically|Possible problem}} Wikipedia says they degrade easily, but doesn't elaborate.{{rn}} ===Manufacturing costs=== {{basically|Probably low-cost (good)}} Maybe cheap enough to viably cover all rooftops. Probably low inputs of energy, materials and labor. This would mean a very good EROI, hopefully.{{rn}} ===Efficiency=== {{basically|Low but not too bad|good}} Probably about 6% efficient. {{...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{considerations}}
Is this a good candidate for [[solar]] to replace [[fossil fuels]]? Maybe.
 
{{considerations}} __NOTOC__
==Considerations==
==Considerations==
===Lifespan===
===Lifespan===
{{basically|Possible problem}}
{{basically|Possible problem}}
Wikipedia says they degrade easily, but doesn't elaborate.{{rn}}
[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_solar_cell Wikipedia says they degrade easily], but doesn't elaborate.{{rn}}


===Manufacturing costs===
===Manufacturing costs===
Line 11: Line 13:
===Efficiency===
===Efficiency===
{{basically|Low but not too bad|good}}
{{basically|Low but not too bad|good}}
Probably about 6% efficient. {{x|based on [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_solar_cell wikipedia page] saying that organic solar cells (average-case) are about 1/3 the efficiency of other (hard material) photovoltaic types. It cited [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14356007.a24_369 some study that's paywalled]; exact stat has not been tracked down yet.}}
Probably about 6% efficient. {{x|based on the wikipedia page that says that organic solar cells (average-case) are about 1/3 the efficiency of other (hard material) photovoltaic types. It cited [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14356007.a24_369 some study that's paywalled]; exact stat has not been tracked down yet.}}


This might be enough for [[rooftop solar]] to provide about half of the world's [[energy demand]] if all rooftops were covered in organic solar panels.
This might be enough for [[rooftop solar]] to provide about half of the world's [[energy demand]] if all rooftops were covered in organic solar panels.

Revision as of 03:44, 15 May 2023

Is this a good candidate for solar to replace fossil fuels? Maybe.

Considerations

Lifespan

Possible problem

Wikipedia says they degrade easily, but doesn't elaborate.[RESEARCH needed]

Manufacturing costs

Probably low-cost (good)

Maybe cheap enough to viably cover all rooftops. Probably low inputs of energy, materials and labor. This would mean a very good EROI, hopefully.[RESEARCH needed]

Efficiency

Low but not too bad

Probably about 6% efficient. (...)( based on the wikipedia page that says that organic solar cells (average-case) are about 1/3 the efficiency of other (hard material) photovoltaic types. It cited some study that's paywalled; exact stat has not been tracked down yet. )

This might be enough for rooftop solar to provide about half of the world's energy demand if all rooftops were covered in organic solar panels.

Flexibility

Useful feature

Organic solar cells are far more bendable than other photovoltaic materials. They could be installed in places other solar cells can't.[EXAMPLE needed]