2,956
edits
(→How much would be needed, if hydrogen were scaled up?: Added some more DPs, planning to use them in new estimates in future edits) |
m (Elie moved page Hydrogen gas to Archive:000/Hydrogen gas without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:Energy storage]] | [[Category:Energy storage]] | ||
'''Hydrogen gas''' (H<sub>2</sub>) is a combustible fuel that leaves behind | '''Hydrogen gas''' (H<sub>2</sub>) is a combustible fuel that leaves behind water vapor (H<sub>2</sub>O) when burned {{light|(no carbon)}}. <!-- | ||
<!-- | '''Hydrogen gas''' (H<sub>2</sub>) is a combustible fuel that leaves behind only water vapor (H<sub>2</sub>O) when burned {{x|when burned in pure oxygen at least. Note that when it's burned in plain air, there are still some nitrogen oxides produced as well - but in any case, no CO<sub>2</sub> is produced from the combustion}}. --> | ||
There are '''no''' natural resources of hydrogen gas{{x|except in rare and extremely small quantities, not a viable way to supply [[energy]] in any meaningful amount}}. | There are basically '''no''' natural resources of hydrogen gas{{x|except in rare and extremely small quantities, not a viable way to supply [[energy]] in any meaningful amount}}. To make hydrogen gas, you need to use some other [[energy]] source. In this way, hydrogen can be understood as a form of '''[[energy storage]]'''. | ||
To make hydrogen gas, you need to use some other [[energy]] source. In this way, hydrogen can be understood as a form of '''[[energy storage]]'''. | |||
'''''This page is about how hydrogen gas could be used | '''''This page is about how hydrogen gas could be used in an all-renewable [[energy]] scenario.''''' | ||
{{considerations}} | {{considerations}} | ||
== | ==Energy storage basics== | ||
For [[energy storage]] of renewable electricity: | |||
* Hydrogen gas would be '''produced''' via ''electrolysis'': | |||
* | ** Electricity is used to convert water (H<sub>2</sub>O) into hydrogen gas and oxygen gas. | ||
* Hydrogen gas would be '''consumed''' via... | |||
** Burning it as fuel, producing heat. | |||
** Using it in ''fuel cells'', producing electricity {{light|(and still some heat)}}. | |||
** {{light|In both cases, the hydrogen reacts with oxygen in the air to form H<sub>2</sub>O again (water vapor).}} | |||
This process has more energy losses than charging/discharging a battery, but hydrogen gas is far better suited for '''long-term''' energy storage. Hydrogen can be stockpiled in pressurized tanks (if designed properly). It can also be [[transportation of hydrogen gas|shipped]] long distances, just like any other fuel. This could help in cases where renewable energy sources are geographically far away from where energy is needed. | |||
Hydrogen fuel | The intent would be for hydrogen gas to be used in place of [[fossil fuels]]: | ||
* Cars, trucks, etc. would be: | |||
** [[Hydrogen combustion vehicles]], or | |||
** [[Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles]] | |||
* Homes & buildings: | |||
** For [[heating]]: Hydrogen gas could be burned instead of [[natural gas]]. | |||
** For cooking food: Hydrogen gas could probably work with gas stoves. {{rn}} | |||
* Factories: | |||
** Most of the energy used in manufacturing is in the form of high heat needed for processing materials. Factories could burn hydrogen gas instead of burning [[coal]] or natural gas. | |||
== | ==Energy sources== | ||
'''Main use-case:''' Storing surplus [[wind power]].<br /> | |||
Here's why: | |||
* Wind power is far more intermittent than [[solar]]. Whereas solar follows a day/night cycle, windy and not-so-windy seasons can last for ''months'' at a time. | |||
* Wind turbines tend to be geographically far away from where electricity is needed, on average. Wind power is more spread out in terms of [[land]], compared to the same amount of energy from local [[rooftop solar]]. Hydrogen could be transported long distances that can't be reached with power lines. | |||
'''Other use-case:''' Since solar panels produce more energy in the summer, it would still be worthwhile to store ''some'' of that energy via hydrogen gas, to be used during the winter. {{light|Note, however: Batteries are a better choice for smoothing out the ''day/night cycle'' of solar power.}} | |||
{{ | |||
Both | '''Other use-case:''' Storing energy from [[hydroelectricity]] during long periods of low demand. | ||
<!-- TODO: find number to fill this in with: | |||
For renewables & hydrogen to replace all fossil fuels, hydrogen production & consumption would have to scale up by about ___ times the status quo. | |||
--> | |||
==Status quo== | |||
* [[Wind power]] is not in surplus yet {{light|(in most parts of the world)}}. | |||
* Most hydrogen today is '''produced''' from [[fossil fuels]] ([[natural gas]]) via [//wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_reforming steam reforming]. The carbon emissions are as high as burning the natural gas itself. | |||
* Most hydrogen today is '''used''' in producing [[fertilizer]]. | |||
==Platinum-group metals== | |||
{{sum|Problem in some cases}} | |||
'''Tl;dr:''' Too many [[fuel cell vehicles]] '''would''' be a problem. Hydrogen production would '''not''' be. | |||
Both ''electrolysis'' and ''fuel cells'' need platinum-group metals (PGMs): | |||
* '''[platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, iridium, osmium]''' | * '''[platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, iridium, osmium]''' | ||
** Any of these metals will do, but all of them are extremely scarce (even more than gold), with platinum & palladium being the most available. | ** Any of these metals will do, but all of them are extremely scarce (even more than gold), with platinum & palladium being the most available. | ||
Line 59: | Line 67: | ||
{{minor|Note: It ''is'' possible to build fuel cells and electrolysis systems without PGMs, but the energy-efficiency is much lower.{{qn}} There are scientists trying to overcome this,<sup>[LINKS needed]</sup> but there's no guarantee that it will be viable in the near future.}} | {{minor|Note: It ''is'' possible to build fuel cells and electrolysis systems without PGMs, but the energy-efficiency is much lower.{{qn}} There are scientists trying to overcome this,<sup>[LINKS needed]</sup> but there's no guarantee that it will be viable in the near future.}} | ||
The supply of PGMs is limited to what we can mine from the Earth (mineral reserves / resources), so we have to be mindful of how much would be needed. | |||
===How much would be needed, if hydrogen were scaled up?=== | |||
<!-- --- DATA POINTS --- --> | <!-- --- DATA POINTS --- --> | ||
{{dp | {{dp | ||
Line 122: | Line 125: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{dp | {{dp | ||
|<nowiki>pgm. | |<nowiki>pgm.status_quo_mining_production</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>platinum.mine_production + palladium.mine_production</nowiki> | |<nowiki>platinum.mine_production + palladium.mine_production</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Global production of platinum-group metals (PGMs) from mining</nowiki> | |<nowiki>Global production of platinum-group metals (PGMs) from mining (status quo)</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Assumption: that the other PGMs (iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium) are in such small quantities that it's ok that they aren't counted here (because data is unavailable)</nowiki> | |<nowiki>Assumption: that the other PGMs (iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium) are in such small quantities that it's ok that they aren't counted here (because data is unavailable)</nowiki> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 130: | Line 133: | ||
|<nowiki>pgm.reserves</nowiki> | |<nowiki>pgm.reserves</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>70000 tonnes</nowiki> | |<nowiki>70000 tonnes</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Global reserves of platinum-group metals</nowiki> | |<nowiki>Global mineral reserves of platinum-group metals</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Includes platinum, palladium, ruthenium, rhodium, osmium, iridium.</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |<nowiki>Includes platinum, palladium, ruthenium, rhodium, osmium, iridium.</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | ||
</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | </nowiki><br /><nowiki> | ||
Line 198: | Line 201: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{dp | {{dp | ||
|<nowiki>fossil_fuels. | |<nowiki>fossil_fuels.consumption</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>11596.92 Mtoe/year</nowiki> | |<nowiki>11596.92 Mtoe/year</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Total consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas (worldwide)</nowiki> | |<nowiki>Total consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas (worldwide) (energy units)</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Key World Energy Statistics 2020 (IEA report)</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |<nowiki>Key World Energy Statistics 2020 (IEA report)</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | ||
- page 47: World energy balance, 2018</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | - page 47: World energy balance, 2018</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | ||
Line 216: | Line 219: | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
| | | | ||
|Without this, we'd be calculating for just personal vehicles. But we also need to factor in commercial vehicles such as buses and trucks. These vary widely in size, and data is hard to find, so for simplicity sake, we just assume that they'd add up to about the same as personal vehicles - thus doubling total energy storage needed. This assumption is based on the fact that freight trucks are a somewhat smaller share of [[energy demand]] than passenger vehicles, but the trucks probably | |Without this, we'd be calculating for just personal vehicles. But we also need to factor in commercial vehicles such as buses and trucks. These vary widely in size, and data is hard to find, so for simplicity sake, we just assume that they'd add up to about the same as personal vehicles - thus doubling total energy storage needed. This assumption is based on the fact that freight trucks are a somewhat smaller share of [[energy demand]] than passenger vehicles, but the trucks need far more horsepower and probably a longer range. | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- --- END OF DATA POINTS --- | <!-- --- END OF DATA POINTS --- | ||
--> | |||
'''Scenario 1:''' If hydrogen gas (from wind power) were to directly replace all fossil fuels (this implies that people would drive [[hydrogen combustion vehicles]]): | |||
<tab name="SEE MATHS" collapsed> | |||
{{calc | {{calc | ||
| | |electrolysis.pgm_by_power / electrolysis.efficiency / wind.capacity_factor * fossil_fuels.consumption | ||
| | |% pgm.reserves | ||
| | |... | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{calc | {{calc | ||
| | |... | ||
| | |years pgm.status_quo_mining_production | ||
| | |||'''PGMs needed for hydrogen gas production.''' | ||
|PGMs needed for hydrogen | |||
}} | }} | ||
</tab> | |||
* The amount of PGMs needed is pretty reasonable '''(16% of mineral reserves)'''. We'd still have to mine for PGMs a lot faster than the status-quo (and do it ''without'' exploitative [[labor]]). {{npn}} | |||
{{minor|To prevent NOx emissions ([[#NOx emissions|see section below]]), hydrogen combustion vehicles need ''catalytic converters'', just like gasoline or diesel vehicles do. Catalytic converters ''also'' contain some PGMs, which could be obtained by recycling old catalytic converters from fossil-fuel vehicles.}} | |||
'''Scenario 2:''' If all vehicles were hydrogen [[fuel cell vehicles]] instead: | |||
<tab name="SEE MATHS" collapsed> | |||
{{calc | {{calc | ||
| | |(toyota_mirai.pgm - catalytic_converter.pgm) * world.cars * commercial_factor | ||
|% pgm.reserves | |% pgm.reserves | ||
| | |... | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{calc | {{calc | ||
| | |... | ||
|years pgm. | |years pgm.status_quo_mining_production | ||
| | |||'''PGMs needed to make the fuel-cell vehicles.'''{{minor|Fuel-cell vehicles don't have catalytic converters, but a fuel cell contains far more PGMs than a catalytic converter.}} | ||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
</tab> | |||
<!-- TALK: | |||
Maybe I should refactor [[template:calc]] to allow for presenting one calculation in multiple units? This would involve some design decisions. | |||
--> | |||
* One benefit of fuel cell vehicles is that they're more energy-efficient than combustion vehicles (i.e. less hydrogen used per kilometer driven). | |||
* | * The problem is, the fuel cells alone would need '''7 times more''' PGMs mined than Scenario 1 (estimated). Perhaps too much to be scalable. And this is true ''even though'' we factored in the recycling of old catalytic converters. | ||
< | <tab name="General principles" collapsed> | ||
{{minor|The mass of PGMs needed is proportional to ''peak power'':}} | |||
* For electrolysis systems, the maximum '''rate of hydrogen production''' {{light|is limited by the amount of PGMs}}. | |||
* For fuel cell vehicles, the '''horsepower''' {{light|is limited by the amount of PGMs}}. | |||
** {{minor|But the vehicle can still achieve ''short bursts'' of higher horsepower if there's a battery or supercapacitor in parallel with the fuel cell.}} | |||
</tab> | |||
<tab name="More notes on these estimates" collapsed> | |||
More musings about the calculations above: | More musings about the calculations above: | ||
* Hydrogen ''combustion'' vehicles are about as energy-efficient as gasoline combustion vehicles. | * All of this assumes that electrolyzers and fuel cells can be completely recycled at their end-of-life, with all PGMs recovered. If they can't, we're kind of screwed in the long run (at least for hydrogen). | ||
* Home electricity | * Hydrogen ''combustion'' vehicles are about as energy-efficient as gasoline combustion vehicles. Hence we can assume that the Scenario 1 estimate is accurate enough. | ||
* Home electricity can also be done with fuel cells - this would of course need more PGMs (and more hydrogen to make up for the losses in fuel cells (although those losses could be used as [[heating]] in some cases)). | |||
* We didn't count the hydrogen needed in the vehicles that transport the hydrogen (hopefully would be minor, like with fossil fuel transport). | |||
* We didn't count the hydrogen needed in the vehicles that transport the hydrogen (hopefully would be minor, like with fossil fuel transport). | * All this is based on status-quo energy demand, which unfortunately relies on the fact that most of the world currently lives in poverty. If all nations were developed, more resources would be needed. | ||
* All this is based on status-quo energy demand, which relies on the fact that most of the world currently lives in poverty. If all nations were developed, | |||
* But in any case, we probably wouldn't actually use wind/hydrogen for everything anyway. [[Rooftop solar]] combined with [[the great battery challenge|batteries]] could probably be a better way to provide electricity whenever hydrogen need not be involved. | * But in any case, we probably wouldn't actually use wind/hydrogen for everything anyway. [[Rooftop solar]] combined with [[the great battery challenge|batteries]] could probably be a better way to provide electricity whenever hydrogen need not be involved. | ||
* Since vehicle fuel cells use the biggest share of PGMs in this estimate, this is yet another reason to advocate for [[public transit]] and [[walkability]]. | * Since vehicle fuel cells use the biggest share of PGMs in this estimate, this is yet another reason to advocate for [[public transit]] and [[walkability]]. | ||
</tab> | |||
< | ===Verdict=== | ||
* If we're going to have hydrogen-powered vehicles, most of them will probably have to be combustion only (or some sort of hybrid with just a very small fuel cell). | |||
{{sum| | * At least PGMs are not a limiting factor for wind-based hydrogen ''production''. | ||
==Energy losses== | |||
{{sum|Lossy but manageable}} | |||
* Electrolysis is at most 80% efficient. | |||
* Fuel cells are at most 60% efficient. | |||
* Thus, best-case ''electricity'' recovery is only 48%{{x|in other words, 60% of 80%}}. Far less than most batteries which have a charge-discharge efficiency of 80% to 90%. | |||
** But for things that just need ''heat'', then the energy recovery is still a good 80%. For example, wind power to produce hydrogen gas to burn for heating homes. | |||
*** Note however: For vehicles, this is outweighed by the fact that [[hydrogen combustion vehicles]] are less fuel-efficient than [[fuel cell vehicles]]. | |||
{{pn|TODO: Add calculation: Knowing the losses, is there still enough [[land]] for wind-generated hydrogen gas were to directly replace all fossil fuels, in principle?}} | |||
{{dp | |||
|<nowiki>hydrogen_gas.specific_energy</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>120 MJ/kg</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki></nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>"By contrast, hydrogen has an energy density of approximately 120 MJ/kg , almost three times more than diesel or gasoline. In electrical terms, the energy density of hydrogen is equal to 33.6 kWh of usable energy per kg, versus diesel which only holds about 12–14 kWh per kg."</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |||
Oct 2, 2019</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |||
Run on Less with Hydrogen Fuel Cells - RMI</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |||
rmi.org › Blog </nowiki> | |||
}} | |||
{{dp | |||
|<nowiki>water.hydrogen_by_mass</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>hydrogen*2 / (hydrogen*2 + oxygen)</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>What percent of water's mass is hydrogen atoms</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>It's about 11%. Expressed using the calculator's built-in chemistry constants (atomic masses).</nowiki> | |||
}} | |||
{{dp | |||
|<nowiki>electrolysis.efficiency</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>80%</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>Energy efficiency of producing hydrogen & oxygen gases from water</nowiki> | |||
|<nowiki>Hydrogen made by the electrolysis of water is now cost-competitive ...</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |||
www.carboncommentary.com › blog › hydrogen-made-by-the-electrolysis... </nowiki> | |||
}} | |||
In cases where electrolysis is done in weather below 0°C, such as beside wind turbines in cold parts of the world during winter, losses may be somewhat worse. {{x|The water has to be liquid (not frozen) while it's being electrolyzed to become hydrogen and oxygen. Heating takes energy; then again, maybe the waste heat of electrolysis would already be enough to keep the water liquid. In theory it can: For any amount of H<sub>2</sub>O electrolyzed, the waste heat is 8 times more than what it takes to melt that amount of ice: {{p2|'''[See calculation]'''|{{calc|hydrogen_gas.specific_energy * water.hydrogen_by_mass * (100% - electrolysis.efficiency)|water_fusion_heat}} {{pn|Maybe this belongs on a separate page called "hydrogen gas production in winter weather"?}} }}. For this to work, the hydrogen production system would have to be well-insulated from the weather. }} {{npn}} | |||
==Shelf life / storage== | |||
{{sum|{{rn}} }} | |||
Chemically, hydrogen is the lightest gas (smallest molecules). This makes it harder to store than other gases, but there are still ways. {{en}} | |||
{{pn-block| | |||
read later: some relevant info might be found in: https://europe.autonews.com/suppliers/faurecia-gets-213m-euros-eu-french-hydrogen-project | |||
<br />basic question: can pressurized hydrogen be stored in (perhaps modified) steel tanks, or will it corrode all but the most expensive materials? | |||
}} | |||
==Pipelines== | |||
{{sum|{{rn}} }} | |||
Could existing natural gas pipelines be used for transporting hydrogen gas? Or would it cause too much leakage/corrosion? {{rn}} | |||
==Safety== | |||
{{sum|Manageable}} | |||
* Just like natural gas, hydrogen gas is non-toxic and odorless but highly flammable. For safety in consumer applications, small quantities of some non-toxic but smelly gas{{x|such as methyl mercaptan, hydrogen sulfide, or ethyl isobutyrate (Wikipedia has a page "Hydrogen odorant")}}should be added to it, so that people would know if there's a gas leak. | |||
* {{pn|This section needs more safety-related info.}} | |||
==NOx emissions== | |||
{{sum|Manageable}} | |||
Burning hydrogen gas in air produces nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the same amount as burning gasoline or any other fuel. This happens because air is 78% nitrogen gas and 21% oxygen gas - any high temperature will cause some of the nitrogen to react with the oxygen. NOx gases contribute to [[climate change]]. {{qn}} | |||
For [[hydrogen combustion vehicles]], this problem can be solved the same way it is for gasoline or diesel combustion: The vehicle has a ''catalytic converter'' to convert these gases into harmless substances. This requires some platinum-group metals ([[#Platinum-group metals|see section above]]). | |||
==Atmospheric losses== | |||
{{sum|Very minor}} | |||
'''Concern:''' When hydrogen gas leaks into the atmosphere, it's so light that it ends up being lost forever into outer space via [//wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeans_escape Jeans escape]. If this goes on for ''long enough'', could Earth lose enough hydrogen that this would harm ecosystems or deplete the global water supply? How long would that take exactly? | |||
'''Answer:''' If we assume: | |||
* that hydrogen gas leaks would happen at about the '''same rate''' as natural gas, | |||
* that losing '''0.1%''' of the world's oceans would be enough to be a problem, | |||
* that hydrogen gas would be replacing '''all''' fossil fuels, by energy, | |||
Then it would take more than a '''million''' years to have even a minor effect on the ecosystems: | |||
<tab name="(see maths)"> | |||
{{dp | |||
|natural_gas.leak_rate | |||
|1.4% | |||
|Percent of natural gas that is lost to leaks | |||
|[https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2022-methane-leaks-natural-gas-energy-emissions-data/ As Natural Gas Booms, Methane Leaks Spark Climate Alarm - Bloomberg] | |||
}} | |||
{{dp | |||
|water.hydrogen_by_mass | |||
|(hydrogen*2)/(hydrogen*2+oxygen) | |||
|How much of water's mass is hydrogen | |||
|About 11%. Calculated using chemistry constants built into the calculator. | |||
}} | |||
{{dp | |||
|oceans.volume | |||
|1.35 billion km^3 | |||
|Total volume of all oceans on Earth | |||
|https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/SyedQadri.shtml | |||
}} | |||
{{dp | |||
|hydrogen_gas.energy_by_mass | |||
|120 MJ/kg | |||
|The ''specific energy'' of hydrogen gas | |||
|"...hydrogen has an energy density of approximately 120 MJ/kg , almost three times more than diesel or gasoline. In electrical terms, the energy density of hydrogen is equal to 33.6 kWh of usable energy per kg, versus diesel which only holds about 12–14 kWh per kg." - Oct 2, 2019 - Run on Less with Hydrogen Fuel Cells - RMI - rmi.org › Blog | |||
}} | |||
{{calc | |||
|0.1% oceans.volume * waterdensity * water.hydrogen_by_mass | |||
|million years (natural_gas.leak_rate / hydrogen_gas.energy_by_mass * fossil_fuels.consumption) | |||
}} | |||
{{minor|Side note: For the same amount of energy, this is still a lot more hydrogen loss than [[nuclear fusion]] of hydrogen atoms.}} | |||
</tab> | |||
<!-- | |||
TODO: compare the hydrogen losses to the hydrogen the earth gains from solar winds | |||
TODO: add new heading: | |||
==Climate effects of leaks== | |||
Hydrogen is not directly a greenhouse gas, but it slows the breakdown of atmospheric methane (which ''is'' a greenhouse gas). Therefore hydrogen gas leaks do have ''some'' effect on warming the climate. {{qn}} | |||
--> | --> | ||
==Color terminology== | ==Color terminology== | ||
Hydrogen is a colorless gas, but | Hydrogen is a colorless gas, but researchers sometimes ''name'' it with colors to indicate ''how it was produced'': | ||
* "Grey hydrogen" is made from natural gas (steam reforming) - high [[greenhouse gas]] emissions. Currently the vast majority of hydrogen is produced this way. | * "Grey hydrogen" is made from natural gas (steam reforming) - high [[greenhouse gas]] emissions. Currently the vast majority of hydrogen is produced this way. | ||
* "Blue hydrogen" is made from natural gas the same way, but with [[carbon capture]]. This is ''supposed'' to reduce emissions, but ''in practice'' it doesn't help much.<!-- TODO: cite that article I found awhile ago --> | * "Blue hydrogen" is made from natural gas the same way, but with [[carbon capture]]. This is ''supposed'' to reduce emissions, but ''in practice'' it doesn't help much.<!-- TODO: cite that article I found awhile ago --> | ||
* "Pink hydrogen" is made from electrolysis using [[nuclear]] energy. | * "Pink hydrogen" is made from electrolysis using [[nuclear]] energy. | ||
* "Green hydrogen" is made from electrolysis using renewable energy. | * "Green hydrogen" is made from electrolysis using renewable energy. | ||
* "White hydrogen" is naturally-occuring hydrogen (very rare). | |||
<!-- TODO: mention white hydrogen discovered in france (september 2023), 46 Mt resource which is nothing compared to global energy demand of 9938 Mtoe/year --> | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
SCRAP: Not sure where to put this | SCRAP: Not sure where to put this, if anywhere at all: | ||
===Production from fossil fuels=== | ===Production from fossil fuels=== | ||
Currently most hydrogen is produced from [[natural gas]] via [//wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_reforming steam reforming], but this emits just as much CO<sub>2</sub> as burning the natural gas itself. | Currently most hydrogen is produced from [[natural gas]] via [//wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_reforming steam reforming], but this emits just as much CO<sub>2</sub> as burning the natural gas itself. | ||
Line 309: | Line 416: | ||
There's another (similar) process called [[methane cracking]] which takes in natural gas, and produces hydrogen gas + solid carbon (not CO<sub>2</sub>). The main problem is that it's a ''net loss'' of energy {{x|it takes a lot more energy than you ultimately get by burning the hydrogen gas}}. In theory, it doesn't have to be. | There's another (similar) process called [[methane cracking]] which takes in natural gas, and produces hydrogen gas + solid carbon (not CO<sub>2</sub>). The main problem is that it's a ''net loss'' of energy {{x|it takes a lot more energy than you ultimately get by burning the hydrogen gas}}. In theory, it doesn't have to be. | ||
{{p|Chemistry equations:<br />CH<sub>4</sub> → C + 2 H<sub>2</sub>   (endothermic: 75 kJ/mol)<br />2 H<sub>2</sub> + O<sub>2</sub> → 2 H<sub>2</sub>O (exothermic: 572 kJ/mol)}} | {{p|Chemistry equations:<br />CH<sub>4</sub> → C + 2 H<sub>2</sub>   (endothermic: 75 kJ/mol)<br />2 H<sub>2</sub> + O<sub>2</sub> → 2 H<sub>2</sub>O (exothermic: 572 kJ/mol)}} | ||
--> | --> | ||
==See also== | |||
* [[Methane cracking]] {{light|- another way to produce hydrogen gas. Not worthwhile currently, but ''in theory'' the right tech could maybe change that.}} | |||
* [[Energy storage]] |