Archive:000/Lack of analog controls: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "==Examples== {{empty}} ==Why it's a problem== * <!--''Added failure modes:''--> If the battery dies or the software has a glitch, the '''access is gone'''. ** {{light|''Babies have been locked in cars this way.''}} {{pn|TODO: add link}} * More expensive, with no real tangible improvement. * Internally, all the same analog components still exist - you just can't reach them. So none of the "old-fashioned problems" are prevented anyway. * In the case of touchscreens in car...") |
m (Elie moved page Lack of analog controls to Archive:000/Lack of analog controls without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 16:29, 26 October 2024
Examples
This section has not been filled in yet.
Why it's a problem
- If the battery dies or the software has a glitch, the access is gone.
- Babies have been locked in cars this way. TODO: add link
- More expensive, with no real tangible improvement.
- Internally, all the same analog components still exist - you just can't reach them. So none of the "old-fashioned problems" are prevented anyway.
- In the case of touchscreens in cars, the driver can't use it without taking their eyes off the road (whereas analog controls can be felt - muscle memory makes them easier to use over time).
What motivated companies to do this to products
- Superficially, the all-digital controls seem more "technologically advanced". This impresses shareholders.
- People who criticize the lack of analog controls, are labelled as anti-tech boomer luddites. Proper discourse doesn't happen often enough.
What can be done
Collective actions to take ✊🏻✊🏽✊🏿
This section has not been filled in yet.
Better designs
This section has not been filled in yet.