Archive:000/Zero food-feed competition: Difference between revisions

m
Elie moved page Zero food-feed competition to Archive:000/Zero food-feed competition without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor
No edit summary
m (Elie moved page Zero food-feed competition to Archive:000/Zero food-feed competition without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 156: Line 156:
In other words, globally most cows are ''already'' fed mostly non-human-edible matter, but beef and dairy production are fairly low.
In other words, globally most cows are ''already'' fed mostly non-human-edible matter, but beef and dairy production are fairly low.


<!-- TODO: expand about countries that eat more beef/dairy: how it's done:
Chicken and pig consumption is moderate, but even this level requires [[:File:food-funnel.png|36% of human-edible calories to be fed to animals]].
     - either by already having a lot of pasture land (i.e. australia)
 
     - or by destroying wildlife to make new pasture (i.e. brazil)
<!-- Just think how much higher this would be if the whole world ate as much animal protein as the average "first world" citizen. -->
     - or by growing enormous amounts of corn and soy, which could have been fed to humans instead (i.e. usa and also brazil)
<!-- TODO: uncomment the above line after adding data about how much animal protein is eaten in particular countries.
There are a few ways it could be presented:
* isochromic world map: population, animal protein consumption, crop land, pasture land. But since we can't fit 4 things perfectly, we have to decide how to compromise.
* Add code to [[Code:food2.sql]] to calculate "total protein from ruminants" and "total protein from other animals", globally and also by region.
** If we don't want to list too many regions, could just do a general 'OECD aggregate'. Not sure how practical this is with the input data tho.
** If we're already using [[Code:food2.sql]], might as well also have it replace the inline calculations for status quo.
*** Although isn't it nicer to have specific stats for cows, chickens, pigs?
**** How about just write "total protein from ruminants (cows, sheep, goats, buffalo)" and "total protein from non-ruminants (chickens, pigs, etc)"?
Should there also be some mention of [[fish]]? Should we just declare that it's (currently?) not in the scope of the analysis?
-->
<!-- btw, should we fit this in somewhere:
    : how do some countries manage to eat more beef/dairy:
     : * either by already having a lot of pasture land (i.e. australia)
     : * or by destroying wildlife to make new pasture (i.e. brazil)
     : * or by growing enormous amounts of corn and soy, which could have been fed to humans instead (i.e. usa and also brazil)
-->
-->