Walkability/No demolition: Difference between revisions

From the change wiki
(Created page with "==The problem== Some cities are known to demolish perfectly good buildings in the name of walkability. Ideally, this should be avoided, because: * There's already a housing shortage. * Materials & labor are not unlimited either. * Construction has an environmental footprint. * For the same cost & resources used, they could have built the new homes elsewhere and left the old ones intact. That would help more to increase the overall housing supply. ===Why it happ...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 25: Line 25:
{{empty}}
{{empty}}


==Comments==
 
<comments />
==Discussions==
''You can leave a comment on the '''{{tp}}'''.''
==See also==
* [[Walkability]]
* [[Subdivide housing]]
* [[Make suburbs walkable]]

Latest revision as of 21:22, 31 December 2024

The problem

Some cities are known to demolish perfectly good buildings in the name of walkability.

Ideally, this should be avoided, because:

  • There's already a housing shortage.
  • Materials & labor are not unlimited either.
  • Construction has an environmental footprint.
  • For the same cost & resources used, they could have built the new homes elsewhere and left the old ones intact. That would help more to increase the overall housing supply.

Why it happens

  • One approach to walkability: Add more housing to neighborhoods that are already walkable.
    • This requires densification, which is often achieved by demolishing houses to make room for taller condo buildings.
    • Neglects other approaches to walkability:
      • Bring more amenities to the suburbs
      • Create entirely new walkable neighborhoods
  • Gentrification
    • In some cases, the total housing supply doesn't even increase at all; it just goes to the highest bidders.
  • Policy makers wanting to avoid sprawl but misunderstanding what makes sprawl a problem

Solutions / Better approaches

  • Repurpose buildings (instead of rebuilding from scratch)
    • If a building isn't condemned, there's probably a solution that doesn't involve demolishing it.
  • Instead of trying to add more housing to the city core, bring walkability to the other residential areas.

Case studies

This section has not been filled in yet.


Discussions

You can leave a comment on the talk page.

See also