Right to repair: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[Planned obsolescence]] | * [[Planned obsolescence]] | ||
* | * [[Dependent product syndrome]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* [//repair.wiki Repair Wiki] - | * [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaOS6bGta7M How John Deere Robs Farmers Of $4 Billion A Year] | ||
* [//repair.wiki Repair Wiki] - a wiki dedicated entirely to the technical details of repairing any device |
Latest revision as of 14:15, 16 January 2025
Why it's needed
Products are becoming harder and harder for people to repair.
- Cars
- Appliances
- Computers
- Smartphones
- Farm equipment
- Medical equipment
Examples
This section has not been filled in yet. discussion TODO: Describe things in story format. Cover cases such as Apple, John Deere, and medical equipment (ventilator mouthpiece example, etc.).
How it happens
The manufacturer creates a monopoly on repairs, so that no one else has the tools or parts required to fix the device. They can charge as much as they want for even the smallest repair, or deny the ability to repair at all (which pressures customers to buy a new product instead). They use a few tactics to make this happen:
- Patenting the replacement parts, so no third-party company can make them.
- Deliberately designing the device's recovery features to be inaccessible without specialized software or hardware that only the company has access to.
Effects
- Even when you buy and own something, you have little control on how you can use it.
- More things get replaced instead of repaired.
- Raises the cost of living (both directly and indirectly - for example health care costs in the case of medical equipment)
- Environmental impact (via more manufacturing and more e-waste)
Laws that need to be passed
This section has not been filled in yet.
Next steps / Actions to take ✊🏻✊🏽✊🏿
This section has not been filled in yet.
FAQ
This section has not been filled in yet. discussion TODO: debunk that fearmongering ad about stalkers. Show factually: ~ why it's not a valid concern ~ why any hypothetical risk would be higher without right-to-repair anyway ~ or failing that, compare the hypothetical risk to the real risks & impacts of not having right to repair ~ lastly, who funded the ad
See also
External links
- How John Deere Robs Farmers Of $4 Billion A Year
- Repair Wiki - a wiki dedicated entirely to the technical details of repairing any device