Stop climate change: Difference between revisions
(Described the pie chart better) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Problems]] __NOTOC__ | [[Category:Problems]] __NOTOC__ | ||
[[File:Emissions-by-sector-–-pie-charts.png|thumb|GHGs (greenhouse gases, such as '''CO<sub>2</sub>''') are the gases that cause climate change. '''This is a pie chart of where they come from.'''<br /><br /><br />Note that a large chunk of emissions are a function of how much new '''"stuff" people buy''': ''See sub-sections of the pie, related to: industry (producing materials, manufacturing), agriculture, and transporting goods.''<br /><br />Other major factors include heating buildings and driving cars.<br /><br /><small>See also: [[:File:energy-demand-pie1.png|This other pie chart]] that shows energy usage in more detail (but doesn't include non-energy emissions).</small>]] | [[File:Emissions-by-sector-–-pie-charts.png|thumb|GHGs (greenhouse gases, such as '''CO<sub>2</sub>''') are the gases that cause climate change. '''This is a pie chart of where they come from.'''<br /><br /><br />Note that a large chunk of emissions are a function of how much new '''"stuff" people buy''': ''See sub-sections of the pie, related to: industry (producing materials, manufacturing), agriculture, and transporting goods.'' {{talk|Also, "fugitive emissions from energy production" are directly a function of how much natural gas is used in all the other pieces of the pie.{{pbr}}In any case, maybe this pie chart isn't divided up in a relevant enough way to illustrate which emissions are driven by what. I'm thinking of making a [[:File:ghg-pie2.png|new one]] (using mostly the same data sources that the people who made this one used).{{pbr}}[[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 10:59, 7 February 2025 (EST)}}<br /><br />Other major factors include heating buildings and driving cars.<br /><br /><small>See also: [[:File:energy-demand-pie1.png|This other pie chart]] that shows energy usage in more detail (but doesn't include non-energy emissions).</small>]] | ||
[[File:carbon-inequality1.png|thumb|Note that half of emissions come from the richest 10% of the world. This ''includes'' '''most people''' who live in "first world" countries.]] | [[File:carbon-inequality1.png|thumb|Note that half of emissions come from the richest 10% of the world. This ''includes'' '''most people''' who live in "first world" countries.]] | ||
Revision as of 11:59, 7 February 2025

Note that a large chunk of emissions are a function of how much new "stuff" people buy: See sub-sections of the pie, related to: industry (producing materials, manufacturing), agriculture, and transporting goods. discussion Also, "fugitive emissions from energy production" are directly a function of how much natural gas is used in all the other pieces of the pie. In any case, maybe this pie chart isn't divided up in a relevant enough way to illustrate which emissions are driven by what. I'm thinking of making a new one (using mostly the same data sources that the people who made this one used). Elie (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2025 (EST)
Other major factors include heating buildings and driving cars.
See also: This other pie chart that shows energy usage in more detail (but doesn't include non-energy emissions).

Climate change is mostly caused by burning fossil fuels for energy - and to a lesser extent, by today's agriculture.
- But note: Agriculture has other major environmental impacts too, besides just climate change.
Solutions we ultimately need ✊🏻✊🏽✊🏿
- Replace ALL fossil fuel energy, with renewables and/or nuclear power
- Not technologically feasible, currently.
- Would become more feasible if the demand for energy (and vehicles) was lower. This is quite viable, as long as people in first-world discussion "first-world", for lack of a better terminology
Talk: I didn't want to say "developed countries" here, because a less experienced person reading quickly might mistake it for "developing countries" (which is the opposite of what I'm trying to convey). I also didn't want to say "rich countries" because some people might mistakenly think their country isn't rich enough for it to apply to them. So I'm stuck using an old, somewhat improper term: "first-world countries". countries are willing to make some lifestyle changes:
- Would become more feasible if the demand for energy (and vehicles) was lower. This is quite viable, as long as people in first-world discussion "first-world", for lack of a better terminology
- Not technologically feasible, currently.
- Some lifestyle changes are still needed even if we phase out fossil fuels:
- Stop food waste
- Make the food supply more plant-based (does not require 100% veganism)
- ↑ These are needed to prevent deforestation. See why.
Base knowledge
Note: Some of these pages might not be written yet:
See also
- Decarbonize the energy supply
- Cultural norms that lead to unsustainable living - and how to fix them
- FAQ - "Why should we reduce our carbon footprint when it's rich corporations' fault?"