Archive talk:000/Minimal consumption scenario: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 24 May 2022 by Elie in topic Emphasis on globalness
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Emphasis on globalness== | ==Emphasis on globalness== | ||
This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption | This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably". | ||
So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extreme inequality). | So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status-quo (extreme inequality). | ||
Is it easy for people to see that that's the | Is it easy for people to see that that's the intended analysis? Or should the bottom section be rephrased? | ||
[[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT) | [[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 24 May 2022
Is the intro too long?
Do we really need the first part before 'the scenario'? I get a feeling it might be better on a different page. Elie (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)
Emphasis on globalness
This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably".
So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen globally. Compare it to the global status-quo (extreme inequality).
Is it easy for people to see that that's the intended analysis? Or should the bottom section be rephrased?