Archive:000/How much electricity would it take: Difference between revisions
m (Elie moved page How much electricity would it take to Archive:000/How much electricity would it take without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
OECD countries are: Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.</nowiki> | OECD countries are: Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.</nowiki> | ||
}} | }} | ||
===World=== | ===World average=== | ||
{{dp | {{dp | ||
|total.status_quo | |total.status_quo | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
|(watts per capita)(world.population) | |(watts per capita)(world.population) | ||
}} | }} | ||
===Developed countries=== | ===Developed countries=== | ||
{{dp | {{dp | ||
Line 110: | Line 111: | ||
This wiki advocates for [[reduce energy demand|decreased energy consumption]] in rich ("developed") countries. But also, poorer countries might need to ''increase'' their energy use. So for lack of more detailed data, the status-quo based "quick estimate" provides a "middle of the road" sense of scale for the amount of renewables that might be needed to reach [[net zero]] carbon emissions. | This wiki advocates for [[reduce energy demand|decreased energy consumption]] in rich ("developed") countries. But also, poorer countries might need to ''increase'' their energy use. So for lack of more detailed data, the status-quo based "quick estimate" provides a "middle of the road" sense of scale for the amount of renewables that might be needed to reach [[net zero]] carbon emissions. | ||
</tab> | </tab> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
=====More detailed analyses===== | =====More detailed analyses===== | ||
{{empty}} | {{empty}} | ||
===Related=== | |||
* [[How much energy storage would it take]] |
Latest revision as of 16:29, 26 October 2024
How much electricity would it take to replace all fossil fuel energy?
Quick estimate
Citation:
"The average fuel economy for new 2020 model year cars, light trucks and SUVs in the United States was 25.4 miles per US gallon (9.3 L/100 km)."
- Fuel economy in automobiles - Wikipedia
ecocostsavings.com/average-electric-car-kwh-per-mile
Data originally from epa.gov/fueleconomy
Last updated in 2023
data.worldbank.org › indicator › SP.POP.TOTL
Using data from 2020
OECD countries are: Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
World average
Cite:
International Energy Agency (IEA) - Key World Energy Statistics 2021 - Page 47 - Using data from 2019
- Does not factor in the charge/discharge energy losses in the battery.
- Does not factor in the energy needed to manufacture EVs (which might be higher than manufacturing combustion vehicles).
(calculation loading) (calculation loading)
Developed countries
Cite:
International Energy Agency (IEA) - Key World Energy Statistics 2021 - Page 49 - Using data from 2019
- Does not factor in the charge/discharge energy losses in the battery.
- Does not factor in the energy needed to manufacture EVs (which might be higher than manufacturing combustion vehicles).
(calculation loading) (calculation loading)
- The estimate is based on status-quo total final energy consumption (which is mostly fossil fuels, currently).
- For the transportation sector, we factor in the increased energy-efficiency of electric vehicles (compared to gasoline & diesel).
- For everything else, we assume there's no significant increase in energy efficiency. Why:
- Industry sector: Most fossil fuel use is for producing heat in manufacturing. The efficiency would be the same for electricity as it would be for fuel.
- Buildings sector: Most fossil fuel use is for heating. While it's true that electric heat pumps could be more efficient, the majority of heating is in locations/seasons too cold for any efficiency gain for heat pumps.
- The
(watts per capita)
refers to watts averaged over the whole year, or as some would say, "watts RMS". Not peak watts.
The estimate could be an overestimate if...
- increased heat pump usage, cold weather heat pump breakthrough
The estimate could be an underestimate if...
- energy storage losses become significant
FAQ: "Why base the estimate off of the status quo?"
This wiki advocates for decreased energy consumption in rich ("developed") countries. But also, poorer countries might need to increase their energy use. So for lack of more detailed data, the status-quo based "quick estimate" provides a "middle of the road" sense of scale for the amount of renewables that might be needed to reach net zero carbon emissions.
See also
More detailed analyses
This section has not been filled in yet.