Archive talk:000/Minimal consumption scenario: Difference between revisions
m (Elie moved page Talk:Minimal consumption scenario to Archive talk:000/Minimal consumption scenario without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Emphasis on globalness== | ==Emphasis on globalness== | ||
This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption | This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably". | ||
So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extreme inequality). | So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status-quo (extreme inequality). | ||
Is it easy for people to see that that's the | Is it easy for people to see that that's the intended analysis? Or should the bottom section be rephrased? | ||
[[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT) | [[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT) | ||
==Bar graph approach== | |||
Maybe use [[File:energy-demand-status-quo.png]] with labels of "this section can be dealt with by..."? Or use that idea on other pages - for example [[walkability]] would say "this page deals with 'road vehicles - passenger'. See other pages to deal with other sections of this bar graph" idk<br />[[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 00:42, 29 May 2022 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:30, 26 October 2024
Is the intro too long? Edit
Do we really need the first part before 'the scenario'? I get a feeling it might be better on a different page. Elie (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT)
Emphasis on globalness Edit
This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably".
So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen globally. Compare it to the global status-quo (extreme inequality).
Is it easy for people to see that that's the intended analysis? Or should the bottom section be rephrased?
Bar graph approach Edit
Maybe use 
with labels of "this section can be dealt with by..."? Or use that idea on other pages - for example walkability would say "this page deals with 'road vehicles - passenger'. See other pages to deal with other sections of this bar graph" idk
Elie (talk) 00:42, 29 May 2022 (EDT)