Archive:000/Decarbonize the energy supply: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How to produce enough [[?|energy]] (for the world) without burning [[fossil fuels]]? | How to produce enough [[?|energy]] (for the world) without burning [[fossil fuels]]? | ||
==Ongoing challenges== | ==Ongoing challenges== | ||
===The {{( | ===The renewables approach {{light|(+ energy storage)}}=== | ||
* [[Solar]] & [[wind power]] would have to be the main sources, because [[?|other renewables are limited to very specific geographic regions]]. | * [[Solar]] & [[wind power]] would have to be the main sources, because [[?|other renewables are limited to very specific geographic regions]]. | ||
* Batteries [[?|might be enough]] to smooth out the '''day/night''' cycle of solar. But the '''seasonal''' fluctuations of wind & solar [[?|probably need ''far more'' energy storage capacity]]. See discussion on [[?| | * Most solar panels today would probably be '''unsustainable''' or even impossible to scale up, due to having [[?|too many scarce minerals in them]]. | ||
** ''See discussion on'' [[?|alternatives to this]]. | |||
More discussions | * Batteries [[?|''might'' be scalable enough]] to smooth out the '''day/night''' cycle of solar. {{x|Best bet would be either [[sodium-ion]] or [[iron redox flow batteries]].}} | ||
** But the '''seasonal''' fluctuations of wind & solar [[?|probably need ''far more'' energy storage capacity]]. | |||
*** ''See discussion on'' [[?|other energy storage types and whether any could provide enough capacity]]. | |||
More discussions: | |||
* [[?|Is there enough land to scale up wind power]] (without causing significant [[habitat loss|ecological damage]])? | * [[?|Is there enough land to scale up wind power]] (without causing significant [[habitat loss|ecological damage]])? | ||
===The nuclear approach=== | ===The nuclear approach=== | ||
Considering the different types of nuclear power, it seems that [[?|'''thorium''' power]] is the one with the least problems: | Considering the different types of nuclear power, it seems that [[?|'''thorium''' power]] is the one with the least problems. Here's a comparison: | ||
{|class='wikitable' | {|class='wikitable' | ||
!rowspan='2' |Type of nuclear power | !rowspan='2' |Type of nuclear power | ||
Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
|Almost none | |Almost none | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Fusion]] (not viable yet) | |[[Fusion]] <span style="background:#F66">(not viable yet)</span> | ||
|Abundant | |Abundant | ||
|Low risk | |Low risk | ||
Line 47: | Line 50: | ||
|colspan=4|{{minor|^ For more details, follow these links in the leftmost column.}} | |colspan=4|{{minor|^ For more details, follow these links in the leftmost column.}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
Actions / discussions / next steps: | Actions / discussions / next steps: | ||
Line 53: | Line 55: | ||
* [[?|Would small (shipping-container-sized) thorium reactors be viable?]] | * [[?|Would small (shipping-container-sized) thorium reactors be viable?]] | ||
====Battery electric vehicles==== | ===Vehicles {{light|- possible options}}=== | ||
* Most EVs today use [[?| | ====Battery-based electric vehicles (EVs)==== | ||
* [[?| | * Most EVs today use [[?|lithium-ion batteries (NMC type)]]. Scaling these up is [[?|'''unsustainable''' due to the amount of '''cobalt''' in them]]. | ||
* [[?|Sodium-ion batteries]] are made from abundant materials - they don't have any mineral-scarcity problem ([[?|probably]]). But they hold even less of a charge than LFP. [[?| | ** Best alternatives [[?|so far]] hold less of a charge (i.e. the vehicle gets less {{p2|range|"Range" refers to the distance the vehicle can travel after 1 full charge.}}). {{talk|TODO: Add to this page a simple comparison between NMC, LFP and sodium-ion, in terms of typical expected EV range.}} | ||
* For '''buses''', LFP and sodium-ion are both perfectly fine. The lower energy-density is not a problem, because buses need extra weight at the bottom anyway for stability. | *** [[?|LFP batteries]] are cobalt-free but still lithium-based. Lithium scarcity [[?|would be somewhat a problem]] but not as bad as cobalt scarcity. | ||
*** [[?|Sodium-ion batteries]] are made from abundant materials - they don't have any mineral-scarcity problem ([[?|probably]]). But they hold even less of a charge than LFP. | |||
**** Sodium-ion batteries are [[?|quite new to the market]] (in 2024), and the hope is that they'll become a lot cheaper than existing batteries. That way, [[?|EVs could be cheap and durable]], with the only tradeoff being the lack of range.{{qn}} Probably still good enough for city/suburban living. | |||
*** For '''buses''', LFP and sodium-ion are both perfectly fine. The {{p2|lower energy-density|i.e. the fact that more battery mass is needed to hold the same amount of energy}} is not a problem, because buses need extra weight at the bottom anyway for stability. | |||
Actions/discussions: | Actions/discussions: | ||
* [[?|Next steps for sodium-ion batteries]] {{talk|Is it true that sodium-ion EVs are available in China already, and just not in North America? If sodium-ion batteries are on the market now, how does their cost compare to lithium-based batteries so far?}} | * [[?|Next steps for sodium-ion batteries]] {{talk|Is it true that sodium-ion EVs are available in China already, and just not in North America? If sodium-ion batteries are on the market now, how does their cost compare to lithium-based batteries so far?}} | ||
* [[?|How well are EV batteries recycled?]] | * [[?|How well are EV batteries recycled?]] | ||
====Hydrogen-fueled vehicles==== | ====Hydrogen-fueled vehicles==== | ||
* Hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles would be unsustainable to scale up, because of the [[?|amount of platinum & palladium in the fuel cells]]. {{talk|This page needs to mention: Hydrogen ''production'' also requires these same metals but it [[?|can be done with much less of them]] and thus could probably be done sustainably.}} | * Hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles would be unsustainable to scale up, because of the [[?|amount of platinum & palladium in the fuel cells]]. {{talk|This page needs to mention: Hydrogen ''production'' also requires these same metals but it [[?|can be done with much less of them]] and thus could probably be done sustainably.}} | ||
* Hydrogen combustion vehicles don't have this problem, but their fuel economy (efficiency) is lower.{{qn}} {{talk|How bad would this be an issue if renewables or nuclear were to be the main energy sources?}} {{talk|Discussion needed: How much hydrogen would have to be stored at any given time, in such a scenario (let's say if it's all produced through nuclear power)? Probably a lot less than the "renewables + energy storage" approach. I need to write a page explaining why.}} | * Hydrogen combustion vehicles don't have this problem, but their fuel economy (efficiency) is lower.{{qn}} {{talk| | ||
How bad would this be an issue if renewables or nuclear were to be the main energy sources?}} {{talk|Discussion needed: How much hydrogen would have to be stored at any given time, in such a scenario (let's say if it's all produced through nuclear power)? Probably a lot less than the "renewables + energy storage" approach. I need to write a page explaining why.}} | |||
====Ammonia-fueled vehicles==== | ====Ammonia-fueled vehicles==== | ||
This wiki needs more research | ''This wiki currently needs more research:''<small> | ||
* How does ammonia compare to hydrogen in terms of: | |||
How does ammonia compare to hydrogen in terms of: | ** Production energy-efficiency | ||
* Production energy-efficiency | ** Fuel cell energy-efficiency | ||
* Fuel cell energy-efficiency | ** Catalyst metals required{{qn}} in ammonia production, and in ammonia fuel cells | ||
* Catalyst metals required | ** Storage (mass of materials required per unit of energy stored)</small> | ||
* Storage (materials required per unit of energy) | |||
==More / See also== | ==More / See also== | ||
{{empty}} | {{empty}} | ||
{{talk|TODO: People also have other concerns about renewables and energy storage. I need to direct readers to pages that address those concerns.}} | |||
{{talk|Maybe title this page "[[Decarbonize the energy supply]]"?}} |
Revision as of 23:05, 8 September 2024
How to produce enough energy (for the world) without burning fossil fuels?
Ongoing challenges
The renewables approach (+ energy storage)
- Solar & wind power would have to be the main sources, because other renewables are limited to very specific geographic regions.
- Most solar panels today would probably be unsustainable or even impossible to scale up, due to having too many scarce minerals in them.
- See discussion on alternatives to this.
- Batteries might be scalable enough to smooth out the day/night cycle of solar.
(...)( Best bet would be either sodium-ion or iron redox flow batteries. ) - But the seasonal fluctuations of wind & solar probably need far more energy storage capacity.
- See discussion on other energy storage types and whether any could provide enough capacity.
- But the seasonal fluctuations of wind & solar probably need far more energy storage capacity.
More discussions:
- Is there enough land to scale up wind power (without causing significant ecological damage)?
The nuclear approach
Considering the different types of nuclear power, it seems that thorium power is the one with the least problems. Here's a comparison:
Type of nuclear power | Problems if scaled up | ||
---|---|---|---|
Fuel scarcity | Weapons proliferation | Nuclear waste | |
Conventional nuclear power (status quo) | Problem | Low risk | Problem |
Conventional small nuclear reactors | Problem | High risk | Problem |
Uranium-238 breeder reactors Additional benefit: Uranium-238 reactors would make use of existing nuclear waste, which has been left over from decades of conventional nuclear power. | Abundant | High risk | Almost none |
Thorium-232 breeder reactors | Abundant | Low risk | Almost none |
Fusion (not viable yet) | Abundant | Low risk | Almost none |
^ For more details, follow these links in the leftmost column. |
Actions / discussions / next steps:
- Why isn't thorium power a thing yet?
- Would small (shipping-container-sized) thorium reactors be viable?
Vehicles - possible options
Battery-based electric vehicles (EVs)
- Most EVs today use lithium-ion batteries (NMC type). Scaling these up is unsustainable due to the amount of cobalt in them.
- Best alternatives so far hold less of a charge (i.e. the vehicle gets less range"Range" refers to the distance the vehicle can travel after 1 full charge.). discussion TODO: Add to this page a simple comparison between NMC, LFP and sodium-ion, in terms of typical expected EV range.
- LFP batteries are cobalt-free but still lithium-based. Lithium scarcity would be somewhat a problem but not as bad as cobalt scarcity.
- Sodium-ion batteries are made from abundant materials - they don't have any mineral-scarcity problem (probably). But they hold even less of a charge than LFP.
- Sodium-ion batteries are quite new to the market (in 2024), and the hope is that they'll become a lot cheaper than existing batteries. That way, EVs could be cheap and durable, with the only tradeoff being the lack of range.[QUANTIFICATION needed] Probably still good enough for city/suburban living.
- For buses, LFP and sodium-ion are both perfectly fine. The lower energy-densityi.e. the fact that more battery mass is needed to hold the same amount of energy is not a problem, because buses need extra weight at the bottom anyway for stability.
- Best alternatives so far hold less of a charge (i.e. the vehicle gets less range"Range" refers to the distance the vehicle can travel after 1 full charge.). discussion TODO: Add to this page a simple comparison between NMC, LFP and sodium-ion, in terms of typical expected EV range.
Actions/discussions:
- Next steps for sodium-ion batteries discussion Is it true that sodium-ion EVs are available in China already, and just not in North America? If sodium-ion batteries are on the market now, how does their cost compare to lithium-based batteries so far?
- How well are EV batteries recycled?
Hydrogen-fueled vehicles
- Hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles would be unsustainable to scale up, because of the amount of platinum & palladium in the fuel cells. discussion This page needs to mention: Hydrogen production also requires these same metals but it can be done with much less of them and thus could probably be done sustainably.
- Hydrogen combustion vehicles don't have this problem, but their fuel economy (efficiency) is lower.[QUANTIFICATION needed] discussion
How bad would this be an issue if renewables or nuclear were to be the main energy sources? discussion Discussion needed: How much hydrogen would have to be stored at any given time, in such a scenario (let's say if it's all produced through nuclear power)? Probably a lot less than the "renewables + energy storage" approach. I need to write a page explaining why.
Ammonia-fueled vehicles
This wiki currently needs more research:
- How does ammonia compare to hydrogen in terms of:
- Production energy-efficiency
- Fuel cell energy-efficiency
- Catalyst metals required[QUANTIFICATION needed] in ammonia production, and in ammonia fuel cells
- Storage (mass of materials required per unit of energy stored)
More / See also
This section has not been filled in yet. discussion TODO: People also have other concerns about renewables and energy storage. I need to direct readers to pages that address those concerns. discussion Maybe title this page "Decarbonize the energy supply"?