Jump to content

Methane cracking: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
But '''in theory''', this need not be true:
But '''in theory''', this need not be true:
: Cracking the methane:
: Cracking the methane:
:: CH4 &rarr; C + 2 H2 &emsp; &emsp; ({{p2|energy in:|'''endo'''thermic reaction}} 74.850 kJ/mol)<br />
:: CH<sub>4</sub> &rarr; C + 2 H<sub>2</sub> &emsp; &emsp; ({{p2|energy in:|'''endo'''thermic reaction}} &emsp; 74.850 kJ/mol)<br />
: Burning the hydrogen:
: Burning the hydrogen:
:: 2 H2 + O2 &rarr; 2 H2O &emsp; ({{p2|energy out:|'''exo'''thermic reaction}} 285.820 kJ/mol)
:: 2 H<sub>2</sub> + O<sub>2</sub> &rarr; 2 H<sub>2</sub>O &emsp; ({{p2|energy out:|'''exo'''thermic reaction}} 571.640 kJ/mol)


===Hydrogen production efficiency comparison===
===Hydrogen production efficiency comparison===
Line 20: Line 20:
|Methane cracking
|Methane cracking
|Theoretical best case
|Theoretical best case
|382% {{p|from the chemistry equations above}}
|764% {{p|from the chemistry equations above}}
|-
|-
|'''Not''' methane cracking
|'''Not''' methane cracking
|Electrolysis of water
|Electrolysis of water
|80%
|&nbsp; 80%
|-
|-
|Methane cracking
|Methane cracking
|Best technologies so far
|Best technologies so far
|__ {{p|to be filled in soon}}
|&nbsp; . . . &nbsp; {{p|To be filled in soon.<br />It's almost certainly less than 80%.}}
|-
|-
|'''Not''' methane cracking
|'''Not''' methane cracking
|Heat -> turbine -> electrolysis of water
|Heat -> turbine -> electrolysis of water
|25%
|&nbsp; 25%
|}
|}


There have been some green initiatives to use ''non-fossil-fuel energy'' to crack methane to make hydrogen gas. However, this is only worthwhile if the ''efficiency'' is better than non-methane-cracking ways to make hydrogen (see table).
There have been some green initiatives to use ''non-fossil-fuel energy'' to crack methane to make hydrogen gas. However, this is only worthwhile if the ''efficiency'' is better than ''non-methane-cracking'' ways to make hydrogen (see table).


Above 100%, you don't need any ''non-fossil-fuel energy'' for it to be green. Just burn some of the hydrogen to keep cracking the methane. Sadly, this has never been achieved.
Above 100%, you don't need any ''non-fossil-fuel energy'' for it to be green. Just burn some of the hydrogen to keep cracking the methane. Sadly, this has never been achieved.


In the ideal case, fossil fuels could power the entire world with zero carbon emissions. At least, until [[peak oil|oil and gas reserves run out]].
In the ideal case, fossil fuels could power the entire world with zero carbon emissions. At least, until [[peak oil|oil and gas reserves run out]].