Archive:000/Limits to sustainable animal consumption: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Fishing== | ==Fishing== | ||
Wild-caught fish could provide 5 or 6 grams/day of protein per capita globally, if none of it was wasted. | Wild-caught fish could provide 5 or 6 grams/day of protein per capita globally, if none of it was wasted. | ||
<tab name="See maths"> | |||
{{dp | {{dp | ||
|<nowiki>seafood.production.wild</nowiki> | |<nowiki>seafood.production.wild</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>93 million tonnes/year</nowiki> | |<nowiki>93 million tonnes/year</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Global production of wild-caught fish and other seafood (not farmed)</nowiki> | |<nowiki>Global production of wild-caught fish and other seafood (not farmed)</nowiki> | ||
|<nowiki>Using most recent data available.</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |<nowiki>Includes bones.</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | ||
Using most recent data available.</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | |||
Fishing grew a lot from 1960 to 1990 but (unlike fish farming) has not increased since 1995. This suggests that we've reached the ecological limit.</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | Fishing grew a lot from 1960 to 1990 but (unlike fish farming) has not increased since 1995. This suggests that we've reached the ecological limit.</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | ||
</nowiki><br /><nowiki> | </nowiki><br /><nowiki> | ||
| Line 60: | Line 61: | ||
|<nowiki>(g/day per capita)(world.population)</nowiki> | |<nowiki>(g/day per capita)(world.population)</nowiki> | ||
}} | }} | ||
</tab> | |||
The sustainable level of consumption might be a bit less than this, because [[overfishing]] is still an issue. | The sustainable level of consumption might be a bit less than this, because [[overfishing]] is still an issue. | ||
The rest of fish is farmed, which, as mentioned earlier, is a net loss of protein. Farmed fish are fed food crops that humans could otherwise eat. | The rest of fish is farmed, which, as mentioned earlier, is a net loss of protein. Farmed fish are fed food crops that humans could otherwise eat. | ||
Revision as of 02:12, 14 March 2023
Farming
- Vegans rightly point out that meat-containing diets require more land (and thus more deforestation). Feeding animals crops is a net loss of protein and calories. But...
- Pro-meat folks rightly point out that some land is only suited for grazing animals. And unlike humans, cows can live on eating grass
.
This raises a more important question:
- If farm animals only ever ate...
- grasses and other plants from pasture & range
, and - the parts of food crops that humans can't eat
,
- grasses and other plants from pasture & range
- and never...
- human-edible food crops
, nor - crops grown specifically for animal feed
,
- human-edible food crops
- how much animal protein
could be produced?
Clearly it's less than the status quo, as there are fewer sources of feed. But how much less?
Analysis in progress - someone is working on this research.
Results will be posted here soon ♥
Hunting
Hunter-gatherer lifestyles were sustainable in prehistoric times when the world population was less than 0.1 billion - today we are at 8.0 billion. Hunting might be a great survival tactic if you're lost in the woods. But it's not going to feed the world. There would be mass extinctions of wild animals if we tried.
Fishing
Wild-caught fish could provide 5 or 6 grams/day of protein per capita globally, if none of it was wasted.
Using most recent data available.
Fishing grew a lot from 1960 to 1990 but (unlike fish farming) has not increased since 1995. This suggests that we've reached the ecological limit.
https://ourworldindata.org/fish-and-overfishing
Last updated in 2023
Grams of fish: (calculation loading) Grams of protein: (calculation loading)
The sustainable level of consumption might be a bit less than this, because overfishing is still an issue.
The rest of fish is farmed, which, as mentioned earlier, is a net loss of protein. Farmed fish are fed food crops that humans could otherwise eat.