3,082
edits
(Refactored) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} | }} | ||
===Not being able to trust pictures, video, audio=== | ===Not being able to trust pictures, video, audio=== | ||
{{R|FAQ | |||
|''What about AI detection software?''<br />Even though generators and detectors both get more advanced over time, the generators ultimately win, unfortunately. ''Read more'' | |||
}} | |||
What could be done: | |||
:; policy ideas: | |||
:* [[Ban unwatermarked generative AI]] {{talk|should watermarking be combined with an additional policy where every AI image generator company has to keep a database of all generated images, and offer a free service for anyone to verify any image on the internet, as in, to see if it matches something in the database?<br />what should we title such a policy?}} | |||
:; tech ideas: | |||
:* [[Anonymous camera digital signature]]s | |||
Status quo:<small> | |||
* Google's AI image generators produce images with a "synth ID" so they can be identified as fake. Not sure how foolproof it is though. | |||
* Sora AI (video generator) adds a subtle watermark to the video. Some people have been known to crop it out though. | |||
* There are plenty of image generators that don't produce any watermark at all. | |||
* Watermarks in general are not hard to remove, unfortunately. Still better than nothing though; most people probably won't bother removing them. So watermarking can at least reduce the total amount of misleading slop on the internet.</small> | |||
{{R|FAQ | {{R|FAQ | ||
|Why not just create more jobs? {{p2|''Read more'' | |Why not just create more jobs? {{p2|''Read more'' | ||