Decarbonize the energy supply: Difference between revisions

→‎The nuclear approach: MULTIPLE CHANGES: 1. Highlighted thorium in bright cyan (more distinguishable from red, even if you have red-green colorblindness). Btw i removed the use of {{rcell}} and {{gcell}}, those templates might need to be refactored if we're gonna stick with the red-cyan theme. 2. Removed some of the links to overly-specific pages we might never create
No edit summary
(→‎The nuclear approach: MULTIPLE CHANGES: 1. Highlighted thorium in bright cyan (more distinguishable from red, even if you have red-green colorblindness). Btw i removed the use of {{rcell}} and {{gcell}}, those templates might need to be refactored if we're gonna stick with the red-cyan theme. 2. Removed some of the links to overly-specific pages we might never create)
Line 24: Line 24:


==The '''nuclear''' approach==
==The '''nuclear''' approach==
Considering the different types of nuclear power, it seems that '''[[thorium power]]''' is the one with the least problems. Here's a comparison:
Of all the different types of nuclear power, {{b|#6FF|'''thorium power'''}} seems to be the best bet:


{|class='wikitable'
{|class='wikitable'
Line 35: Line 35:
|-
|-
|[[Conventional nuclear power]] {{light|(status quo)}}
|[[Conventional nuclear power]] {{light|(status quo)}}
|{{rcell}} Problem
|style="background:#F66"|Problem
|Low risk
|Low risk
|{{rcell}} Problem
|style="background:#F66"|Problem
|-
|-
|[[Conventional small nuclear reactors]]
|Conventional small nuclear reactors
|{{rcell}} Problem
|style="background:#F66"|Problem
|{{rcell}} High risk
|style="background:#F66"|High risk
|{{rcell}} Problem
|style="background:#F66"|Problem
|-
|-
|[[Uranium-238 breeder reactors]] {{p|Additional benefit: Uranium-238 reactors would make use of existing nuclear waste, which has been left over from decades of conventional nuclear power.}}
|Uranium-238 breeder reactors {{p|Additional benefit: Uranium-238 reactors would make use of existing nuclear waste, which has been left over from decades of conventional nuclear power.}}
|Abundant
|Abundant
|{{rcell}} High risk
|style="background:#F66"|High risk
|Almost none
|Almost none
|-
|-
|[[Thorium-232 breeder reactors]]
|style="background:#6FF"|'''Thorium-232 breeder reactors'''
|Abundant
|style="background:#6FF"|'''Abundant'''
|Low risk
|style="background:#6FF"|'''Low risk'''
|Almost none
|style="background:#6FF"|'''Almost none'''
|-
|-
|[[Fusion]] <span style="background:#F66">(not viable yet)</span>
|[[Fusion]] {{b|#F66|(not viable yet)}}
|Abundant
|Abundant
|Low risk
|Low risk
|Almost none
|Almost none
<!-- OUTTAKE (uncomment this if we bring back the page links and actually make the pages this time:
|-
|-
|colspan=4|{{minor|^ For more details, follow these links in the leftmost column.}}
|colspan=4|{{minor|^ For more details, follow these links in the leftmost column.}}
-->
|}
|}


Line 65: Line 67:
* [[Why isn't thorium power a thing yet?]]
* [[Why isn't thorium power a thing yet?]]
* [[Would small (shipping-container-sized) thorium reactors be viable?]]
* [[Would small (shipping-container-sized) thorium reactors be viable?]]


=='''Vehicles''' {{light|- possible options}}==
=='''Vehicles''' {{light|- possible options}}==