Archive:000/Computers/LCA

From the change wiki
Revision as of 14:23, 3 April 2023 by Elie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This is a page about life cycle assessment of computers. ==Ratio needed== We need to compare :''a'': the ''total'' life-cycle energy of a computer:   production{{x|manufacturing + assembly + [if recycling is ''not'' counted in "end-of-life", then include the production of most of the raw materials involved]}} + usage + end-of-life{{x|preferably, estimate how much energy it would take to properly ''recycle'' the computer}} with :''b'': just the energy the comput...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is a page about life cycle assessment of computers.

Ratio needed

We need to compare

a: the total life-cycle energy of a computer:   production + usage + end-of-life

with

b: just the energy the computer is expected to consume during its lifespan of usage.

The ratio would be "a/b" with the definitions above.

What this is needed for

  • You know when news articles talk about how much energy is used in A.I., cloud computing, cryptocurrency, etc.: This only includes the energy consumed by the computers/servers. It doesn't factor in any of the energy it takes to manufacture the computers in the first place. A simple solution would be to multiply by the ratio described above.
  • The ratio would also help computer server owners decidewhether or not to upgrade older computers to newer more energy-efficient ones.

Scope

For now, let's try to estimate this ratio for server computers, because it'd probably be...

  • more predictable: Servers are load-balanced, whereas desktop computers tend to sit idle most of the time.
  • more important: Servers are the most likely to scale up whenever there's growth in crypto or A.I.

For desktop computers and mobile phones, their life-cycle energy is still important for assessing the environmental impact of planned obsolescence and code bloat.