Don't demolish existing buildings

Revision as of 20:46, 15 December 2024 by Elie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Status quo, and why it's a problem== {{empty}} {{talk|Older homes & buildings are demolished to make room for new ones {{pbr}}~ In some cases, it barely increases the housing supply at all {{pbr}}~ And when it does, it does so very inefficiently. For the same amount of materials & labor, they could have kept the old ''and'' built the new {{pbr}}~ Huge environmental footprint - even when you factor in the land use {{pbr}}~ Drives up the price of materials {{pbr}}~ Drive...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Status quo, and why it's a problem

This section has not been filled in yet.  discussionOlder homes & buildings are demolished to make room for new ones  ~ In some cases, it barely increases the housing supply at all  ~ And when it does, it does so very inefficiently. For the same amount of materials & labor, they could have kept the old and built the new  ~ Huge environmental footprint - even when you factor in the land use  ~ Drives up the price of materials  ~ Drives up the price of construction labor (especially as there's such a shortage of trades workers)  ~ Drives up the price of housing for everyone  ~ Benefits only the rich (gentrification)  ~ Why it happens: Shortage of good locations, so prime real estate goes to the highest bidder. The land is valued so high that whoever buys it wants to get their money's worth - so they spend a lot of resources renovating to satisfy their tastes  ~ So in a certain sense, rich people's preferences override poor people's needs

Better solutions

This section has not been filled in yet.  discussionbe sure to make clear that condemned buildings should still be demolished of course, if they're structurally unsound or whatnot

See also