Abolish cruel animal testing

From the change wiki
Revision as of 11:17, 14 March 2025 by Elie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Animal testing''' comes in many forms, some of which are extremely cruel. There needs to be alternatives. ==Case examples and their alternatives== {{empty}} {{talk|Should there also be an "actions to take" section below? Nah, probably no need for it. Each ''case example'' can have its own action campaign link.}} {{talk|For some of these, the alternative could be: "None. The harm to animals outweighs any scientific benefits here."}} {{talk|A little nuance here: Let's s...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Animal testing comes in many forms, some of which are extremely cruel. There needs to be alternatives.

Case examples and their alternatives

This section has not been filled in yet.  discussionShould there also be an "actions to take" section below? Nah, probably no need for it. Each case example can have its own action campaign link.  discussionFor some of these, the alternative could be: "None. The harm to animals outweighs any scientific benefits here."  discussionA little nuance here: Let's say, for the sake of argument, that some kinds of animal testing are a "necessary evil". Even so, we should avoid excessive redundancy. For example: When all the ingredients in a product have already been tested on animals decades ago, is it really necessary to test the product itself? And with each tiny change to the product, more testing??? In general, I would say no - and I think the status quo leans towards too much of this kind of redundant testing. Change is needed - we need very specific campaigns. Not sure how I should present this concept.


See also