Archive:000/Land/built-up

From the change wiki
Revision as of 17:16, 29 August 2022 by Elie (talk | contribs) (Created page with " ==Using 'population' data to estimate built-up land== Some inner cities can be quite dense, but even the less-dense suburbs are still fully ''built-up'', as none of the land is truly ''wilderness'' {{x|even the parks and nature trails are heavily touched by humans}}, and none of it is considered farm land {{x|maybe this could change with suburban farming, but even then, maybe double-counting the same land (as ''both'' cropland ''and'' built-up land) is ok}}. Let's est...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Using 'population' data to estimate built-up land

Some inner cities can be quite dense, but even the less-dense suburbs are still fully built-up, as none of the land is truly wilderness , and none of it is considered farm land .

Let's estimate the minimum population density that might be considered fully built-up land:

suburban_lot_size
5000 ft^2
"Large, 5,000 square foot lots, on the other hand, are the standard in US post-war suburbs."

Do Minimum Lot Size Rules Matter? - Strong Towns www.strongtowns.org › journal › do-minimum-lot-size-rules-matter
housing_fraction
40%
What fraction of the suburban land is housing
The rest would be roads, parks, parking lots, and a small number of commercial buildings.

This is just an educated guess, so if you have actual data, please say it in the Template:TALKPAGENAME.
household_size
3 people
Average number of people living in a house, in our low-density suburb
This is intentionally a low estimate because we want to know the minimum population density for fully-built-up land.

household_size * housing_fraction / suburban_lot_size people per km^2 (calculation loading)

So, any land with more people than this, would be considered 100% built-up land in our analysis.

Any land with fewer people, will be counted proportionally. So if the population density is 10% of the threshold, we say the area contains 10% built-up land. This might be the case of a small family farm, where 90% of the lot is farm land, and the last 10% is housing and driveway.

Technically, there could be fully-built-up areas below this population threshold - such as industrial areas - but those are probably uncommon enough.
Let's test out our threshold using the image generator:

pop << data/population.data-float64-8640x4320 # population counts
pop @@ quantity_to_density # convert to 'people per km^2'
pop /= 5000                # threshold for land to be considered 'fully built-up'
pop <= 1
pop @@ density_to_quantity
pop @@ stats

The "sum" (which will appear in the result from the last line) will be the number of km^2 of built-up land on Earth.

Compare this to official estimates...