Methane cracking: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Energy viability==
==Energy viability==


Every methane-cracking method ''invented so far'' is a ''net loss'' of energy. Meaning that it takes more energy to crack the methane than you ultimately get from burning the hydrogen. But in theory, this need not be true:<br />
Every methane-cracking method ''invented so far'' is a '''net loss''' of energy. Meaning that it takes more energy to crack the methane than you ultimately get from burning the hydrogen.
: CH4 -> C + 2 H2 (endothermic: 74.850 kJ/mol)<br />
 
: 2 H2 + O2 -> 2 H2O (exothermic: 285.820 kJ/mol)
But '''in theory''', this need not be true:
: Cracking the methane:
:: CH4 &rarr; C + 2 H2 &emsp; &emsp; ({{p2|energy in:|'''endo'''thermic reaction}} 74.850 kJ/mol)<br />
: Burning the hydrogen:
:: 2 H2 + O2 &rarr; 2 H2O &emsp; ({{p2|energy out:|'''exo'''thermic reaction}} 285.820 kJ/mol)


===Hydrogen production efficiency comparison===
===Hydrogen production efficiency comparison===
Line 14: Line 18:
|Methane cracking
|Methane cracking
|Theoretical best case
|Theoretical best case
|382% {{p|see chemistry equation above}}
|382% {{p|from the chemistry equations above}}
|-
|-
|'''Not''' methane cracking
|'''Not''' methane cracking