2,956
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Energy viability== | ==Energy viability== | ||
Every methane-cracking method ''invented so far'' is a ''net loss'' of energy. Meaning that it takes more energy to crack the methane than you ultimately get from burning the hydrogen. But in theory, this need not be true: | Every methane-cracking method ''invented so far'' is a '''net loss''' of energy. Meaning that it takes more energy to crack the methane than you ultimately get from burning the hydrogen. | ||
: CH4 | |||
: 2 H2 + O2 | But '''in theory''', this need not be true: | ||
: Cracking the methane: | |||
:: CH4 → C + 2 H2     ({{p2|energy in:|'''endo'''thermic reaction}} 74.850 kJ/mol)<br /> | |||
: Burning the hydrogen: | |||
:: 2 H2 + O2 → 2 H2O   ({{p2|energy out:|'''exo'''thermic reaction}} 285.820 kJ/mol) | |||
===Hydrogen production efficiency comparison=== | ===Hydrogen production efficiency comparison=== | ||
Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
|Methane cracking | |Methane cracking | ||
|Theoretical best case | |Theoretical best case | ||
|382% {{p| | |382% {{p|from the chemistry equations above}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Not''' methane cracking | |'''Not''' methane cracking |