Jump to content

Archive:000/Energy storage: Difference between revisions

m
Elie moved page Energy storage to Archive:000/Energy storage without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor
m (Elie moved page Energy storage to Archive:000/Energy storage without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
|Okay for some applications, but too lossy & platinum-intensive for others.
|Okay for some applications, but too lossy & platinum-intensive for others.
|-
|-
|[[LFP batteries|Lithium ferrous (iron) phosphate]]<!--(LiFePo4 or LFP)-->
|[[Lithium ferro phosphate batteries]]<!--(LiFePo4 or LFP)-->
|Okay if used in moderation. A bit too lithium-intensive to be a general solution.
|Okay if used in moderation. A bit too lithium-intensive to be a general solution.
|-
|-
|[[Lithium-ion batteries]]
|[[Lithium-ion batteries]] <small>(NMC/NCA type)</small>
|Not scalable enough: Too [[cobalt]]-intensive.
|Not scalable enough: Too [[cobalt]]-intensive.
|-
|-
Line 54: Line 54:
<small>For more details, read the wikipage of each energy storage type. Links are in the table.</small>
<small>For more details, read the wikipage of each energy storage type. Links are in the table.</small>


So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the most hope of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage.
So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the [[the great battery challenge|most hope]] of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage.


<!--
<!--
Line 116: Line 116:
* Use the templates on the wikipage of each energy storage type.
* Use the templates on the wikipage of each energy storage type.
-->
-->
[[Category:Energy storage]]