Archive:000/Seeing the evidence but missing the model: Difference between revisions

1 byte added , 26 October 2024

m

2,956

edits

Revision as of 03:12, 3 February 2024 (view source) Elie (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "''Seeing the evidence but missing the model'' is a '''logical fallacy'''. It's one way that journalists & governments misrepresent scientific studies (whether intentionally or not). ==Examples== Evidence seen: : Corn can be burned for energy. Therefore it can replace fossil fuels. Model missed: : Even if we burned all the food in the world, we would still barely meet 10% of global energy demand (and we would starve). Evidence seen: : Most peo...")		Latest revision as of 16:30, 26 October 2024 (view source) Elie (talk \| contribs) m (Elie moved page Seeing the evidence but missing the model to Archive:000/Seeing the evidence but missing the model without leaving a redirect: Huge_refactor)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 40:		Line 40:

	Model missed:		Model missed:
	: For every architect, there has to be hundreds of construction workers to actually build the ~~design~~. Therefore, if we want the world to have more job satisfaction, it doesn't help to push kids to get better grades. Instead, we have to make ''ordinary'' [[labor\|jobs]] more satisfying.		: For every architect, there has to be hundreds of construction workers to actually build the designs. Therefore, if we want the world to have more job satisfaction, it doesn't help to push kids to get better grades. Instead, we have to make ''ordinary'' [[labor\|jobs]] more satisfying.

Archive:000/Seeing the evidence but missing the model (view source)