2,956
edits
Stop climate change: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* '''[[Decarbonize the energy supply|Replace ALL fossil fuel energy, with renewables and/or nuclear power]]''' | * '''[[Decarbonize the energy supply|Replace ALL fossil fuel energy, with renewables and/or nuclear power]]''' | ||
** [[Decarbonize the energy supply| | ** Not technologically feasible, [[Decarbonize the energy supply|currently]]. | ||
*** Would | *** Would become more feasible if the ''demand'' for energy (and vehicles) was lower. This is quite viable, as long as people in {{t2|first-world|"first-world", for lack of a better terminology<br /><br />Talk: <small>I didn't want to say "developed countries" here, because a less experienced person reading quickly might mistake it for "developing countries" (which is the ''opposite'' of what I'm trying to convey). I also didn't want to say "rich countries" because some people might mistakenly think their country isn't rich enough for it to apply to them. So I'm stuck using an old, somewhat improper term: "first-world countries".</small>}} countries are willing to make some lifestyle changes: | ||
**** '''[[We can still have nice things, just not replace them so often]]''' | **** '''[[We can still have nice things, just not replace them so often]]''' | ||
**** '''[[Reduce the need for driving]]''' | **** '''[[Reduce the need for driving]]''' | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Ongoing discussions== | ==Ongoing discussions== | ||
<small> | |||
* [[How much less energy could be used in heating & cooling buildings, in most cases?]] | * [[How much less energy could be used in heating & cooling buildings, in most cases?]] | ||
</small> | |||
==Base knowledge== | ==Base knowledge== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
</small> | </small> | ||
== | ==See also== | ||
* [[Decarbonize the energy supply]] | |||
<!-- TALK: | |||
I only added the "see also" because I wanted the page to end on a link to something solution-related. But it's redundant (already have the same link earlier) and it's not a great next-step for a general audience to read (page gets technical). | |||
I'd much rather refactor the page: | |||
- Make "Solutions we ultimately need" the ONLY true section. | |||
- Make "ongoing discussions" & "base knowledge" become '''side panels'''. | |||
- Don't have a "see also" | |||
--> | |||