2,956
edits
Walkability/No demolition: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Created page with "==The problem== Some cities are known to demolish perfectly good buildings in the name of walkability. Ideally, this should be avoided, because: * There's already a housing shortage. * Materials & labor are not unlimited either. * Construction has an environmental footprint. * For the same cost & resources used, they could have built the new homes elsewhere and left the old ones intact. That would help more to increase the overall housing supply. ===Why it happ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
{{empty}} | {{empty}} | ||
== | |||
==Discussions== | |||
''You can leave a comment on the '''{{tp}}'''.'' | |||
==See also== | |||
* [[Walkability]] | |||
* [[Subdivide housing]] | |||
* [[Make suburbs walkable]] | |||