Archive:000/Lithium-ion batteries: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 82: Line 82:
  TALK: should we compare to cobalt ''resources'' rather than ''reserves'', to see if it's viable? If it is - still, how do we quantify the environmental footprint of mining that much cobalt?
  TALK: should we compare to cobalt ''resources'' rather than ''reserves'', to see if it's viable? If it is - still, how do we quantify the environmental footprint of mining that much cobalt?
-->
-->
<small>This problem could maybe be overcome by solving [[lithium-ion/challenge 1]].</small>
<small>This problem could maybe be overcome by solving [[lithium-ion/challenge 1]].</small>


Line 151: Line 152:
From this perspective, it seems that the energy in ''manufacturing'' the battery is reasonable enough.
From this perspective, it seems that the energy in ''manufacturing'' the battery is reasonable enough.


Note: This doesn't include the energy involved in ''extracting'' the minerals to make the battery - which we already saw was an issue anyway (see above).
Note: This doesn't include the energy involved in ''mining for'' the minerals to make the battery - which we already saw was an issue anyway (see above). {{x|In general, the rarer the mineral, the more energy it takes to mine.}}


Similar calculations could be done for non-vehicle energy storage.<!-- TODO: add them -->
''Similar calculations could be done for non-vehicle energy storage.''<!-- TODO: add them -->


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Sodium-ion batteries]] - a possible solution
* [[Sodium-ion batteries]] - a possible solution